Archive
Editor's Introduction
Eightieth Anniversary of Korean Liberation
Kim Sung-Min
S/N Korean Humanities :: Vol.11 No.2 pp.9-14
Feature Articles
Korean Perceptions of Liberation in Northeast China during the Era of Liberation
This study explores how Korean communities in Northeast
China perceived liberation in the aftermath of Japan’s 1945
defeat, focusing on representations in Korean poetry from
the period. Rather than viewing liberation solely as the end of
colonial rule, the research frames it as a process of “finding
one’s place”—a complex experience involving both ethnic
and economic restoration. The findings suggest that liberation
for Koreans unfolded along two main axes: ethnic liberation,
marked by the recovery of sovereignty from Japanese
colonial rule, and economic liberation, marked by the Chinese
Communist Party’s land reform policies. Ethnic liberation
evoked feelings of joy and relief, but it also brought fear and
uncertainty. Though Koreans were freed from 35 years of
Japanese colonial rule, they now faced hostility from local
Han Chinese, the threat of banditry, and the Kuomintang’s
expulsion policies—challenges that forced them into new
struggles for survival amid the dilemma of repatriation and
permanent resettlement. In contrast, economic liberation—
enabled by Communist land redistribution—allowed many
Koreans to move from tenant farming to land ownership. This
transformation was not merely economic but also symbolic,
catalyzing a shift in identity from “Korean diaspora” to
“Chinese Koreans” and establishment of a new social status
within China.
Traitors or Patriots? Left–Right Polarization within the Korean Community in Postwar Japan
The League of Koreans in Japan (Chae Ilbon Chosŏnin
Yŏnmaeng; abbreviated as Choryon 朝連) was officially
established on October 15, 1945. In its early days, ideological
divisions between left- and right-leaning factions were
not yet overt. However, internal struggles for leadership
eventually pushed the organization toward alignment with
communist forces, leading to its support for the North Korean
regime. Although Choryon’s founding congress nominally
promoted unity across ideological lines, figures such as Kim
Chon-hae—known for his anti-Japanese resistance—found
it impossible to reconcile with individuals linked to pro-
Japanese collaboration. Within a year of Korea’s liberation,
the community of Koreans residents in Japan had become
so deeply polarized that even joint commemoration of the
March First Independence Movement became unfeasible.
This division only deepened during the Cold War, especially
after the establishment of separate governments in North and
South Korea. Each faction within the community of Korean
residents effectively became a conduit for advancing the
unification policies of the respective authoritarian regime it
supported.
Book Review
Institute of the Humanities for Unification at Konkuk University, ed. Shigan-ŭl kŏtta: modŏn sŏul [Walking through Time: Modern Seoul].
Shin Ki-chul
S/N Korean Humanities :: Vol.11 No.2 pp.57-68
Korea–China–Japan Joint History Committee. Mirae-rŭl yŏnŭn yŏksa [History Opening the Future].
Park Min-Cheol
S/N Korean Humanities :: Vol.11 No.2 pp.69-85
Interview
Conversations on Korean Liberation and Zainichi Korean Identity: An Interview with Two Zainichi Koreans*
Interviewer: Lee Taejun
S/N Korean Humanities :: Vol.11 No.2 pp.89-117




