Literary Reception of a Historical Fact and the Matter of the State and Nation - The Wanpaoshan Incident and Literary Response of Korean, Chinese and Japanese Writers

Download PDF
S/N Korean Humanities Vol.3 No.2 pp.51-80 ISSN : 2384-0668(Print)
ISSN : 2384-0692(Online)

Ren Qiule, Li Haiying
Ocean University of China


Received May 31, 2017; Revised version received August 22, 2017; Accepted September 01, 2017

Abstract

The Wanpaoshan Incident that took place in 1931 and the tragic Anti-Chinese Riots that ensued in Korea had great repercussions in the three countries of East Asia. Writers in Korea, China and Japan fictionalized these events concurrently or a few years after the incident. In the other of publication, the novelette Manpozan (October 1931) by Ito Einesuke, a Japanese writer, the novel Wanpaoshan (March 1933) by Li Huiying of China, the novelette “Farmer” (July 1939) by Yi T’ae-Chun of Korea, novella Rice Plant (1941) by An Su-Kil of Korea and the novel Reclamation (1943) by Chang Hyŏk-Chu of Korea were major examples.
This article, using four novels – Ito Einosuke’s Manpozan, Li Huiying’s Wanpaoshan, Yi T’ae-Chun’s “Farmer”, and An Su-Kil’s Rice Plant – as main texts, analyzed the ways in which writers from Korea, Japan and China fictionalized the Wanpaoshan Incident. The four novels dealing with the Wanpaoshan Incident were all written from different perspectives and thus the emphases were different as well. The writers responded differently, and we will show how the writer’s national identity, ideology, and the existence of experience and its depth were articulated in the fictionalization process of a literary work.


Key Words : Wanpaoshan Incident, Ito Einosuke, Li Huiying, Yi T’ae-Chun, An Su-Kil

Crossref Similarity Check logo Crossref logo